<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The straight line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardwick.fi/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog</link>
	<description>Sam Hardwick&#039;s web journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:54:33 +0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on I am Shiva, destroyer of fireplaces by jamie</title>
		<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1648&#038;cpage=1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1648#comment-260</guid>
		<description>bit of a mess you got your self there Sam LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bit of a mess you got your self there Sam LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Porn for girls by Vadim Kulikov</title>
		<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1370&#038;cpage=1#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim Kulikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1370#comment-258</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; I recently watched about 50 hours of Gilmore Girls 

why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; I recently watched about 50 hours of Gilmore Girls </p>
<p>why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Porn for girls by Veikko Eranti</title>
		<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1370&#038;cpage=1#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Veikko Eranti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1370#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Tulipa vaan mieleen, että http://www.hs.fi/juttusarja/parkkinen/artikkeli/Unelma+kylpp%C3%A4rist%C3%A4/1135258601490/?cmp=tm_etu_kolumni sanoo jotain, jolla on tekemistä tämän kanssa. Ihan vaan fyi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tulipa vaan mieleen, että <a href="http://www.hs.fi/juttusarja/parkkinen/artikkeli/Unelma+kylpp%C3%A4rist%C3%A4/1135258601490/?cmp=tm_etu_kolumni" rel="nofollow">http://www.hs.fi/juttusarja/parkkinen/artikkeli/Unelma+kylpp%C3%A4rist%C3%A4/1135258601490/?cmp=tm_etu_kolumni</a> sanoo jotain, jolla on tekemistä tämän kanssa. Ihan vaan fyi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Wohltemperirte by sam</title>
		<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1568&#038;cpage=1#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1568#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Are there only concert recordings by Richter? I think I ignored him on those grounds. But I&#039;ll keep in mind what you said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there only concert recordings by Richter? I think I ignored him on those grounds. But I&#8217;ll keep in mind what you said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Wohltemperirte by av</title>
		<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1568&#038;cpage=1#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>av</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1568#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Sviatoslav Richter&#039;s take is also worth trying, in spite of poor sound quality. When I listen to Gould&#039;s version, I&#039;m most of the time aware of Gould&#039;s presence, while Richter seems to fade in the background, and the music takes over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sviatoslav Richter&#8217;s take is also worth trying, in spite of poor sound quality. When I listen to Gould&#8217;s version, I&#8217;m most of the time aware of Gould&#8217;s presence, while Richter seems to fade in the background, and the music takes over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On gay marriage and unreasonable demands by sam</title>
		<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1539&#038;cpage=1#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1539#comment-253</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;comment-251&quot;&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-251&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vadim Kulikov&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: This is from the point of view of A as if there were a law saying that people are allowed to wear glasses only with negative strength. The same law for everyone — independent of your eyesight. Someone could still consider potential positive glasses wearers as treated not so nicely.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or as B might put it, it&#039;s as if people demanded glasses with negative strength to function as glasses with positive strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="comment-251">
<p><strong><a href="#comment-251" rel="nofollow">Vadim Kulikov</a></strong>: This is from the point of view of A as if there were a law saying that people are allowed to wear glasses only with negative strength. The same law for everyone — independent of your eyesight. Someone could still consider potential positive glasses wearers as treated not so nicely.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Or as B might put it, it&#8217;s as if people demanded glasses with negative strength to function as glasses with positive strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Today I learned by sam</title>
		<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1527&#038;cpage=1#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1527#comment-252</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t, but it&#039;s based on

1) the representability of diophantine systems as polynomials
2) the formulation of primes as such a system (eg. &lt;a href=&quot;http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/?pa=content&amp;sa=viewDocument&amp;nodeId=2967&amp;pf=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)

If you inspect the polynomial closely, you notice that it has the form

(k+2) * (1 - P(a,b,c...)^2 - P&#039;(a,b,c...)^2 ...), so it will be positive only when all the polynomials P are zero. They essentially select the prime values of k+2. More &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula_for_primes#Formula_based_on_a_system_of_Diophantine_equations&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t, but it&#8217;s based on</p>
<p>1) the representability of diophantine systems as polynomials<br />
2) the formulation of primes as such a system (eg. <a href="http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/?pa=content&#038;sa=viewDocument&#038;nodeId=2967&#038;pf=1" rel="nofollow">here</a>)</p>
<p>If you inspect the polynomial closely, you notice that it has the form</p>
<p>(k+2) * (1 &#8211; P(a,b,c&#8230;)^2 &#8211; P&#8217;(a,b,c&#8230;)^2 &#8230;), so it will be positive only when all the polynomials P are zero. They essentially select the prime values of k+2. More <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formula_for_primes#Formula_based_on_a_system_of_Diophantine_equations" rel="nofollow">on Wikipedia</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On gay marriage and unreasonable demands by Vadim Kulikov</title>
		<link>http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1539&#038;cpage=1#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim Kulikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardwick.fi/blog/?p=1539#comment-251</guid>
		<description>&quot;I agree that homosexuals should have the same rights as everyone else, and they do. Heterosexuals can’t have same-sex marriages either.&quot;


This is from the point of view of A as if there were a law saying that people are allowed to wear glasses only with negative strength. The same law for everyone -- independent of your eyesight. Someone could still consider potential positive glasses wearers as treated not so nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I agree that homosexuals should have the same rights as everyone else, and they do. Heterosexuals can’t have same-sex marriages either.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is from the point of view of A as if there were a law saying that people are allowed to wear glasses only with negative strength. The same law for everyone &#8212; independent of your eyesight. Someone could still consider potential positive glasses wearers as treated not so nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

