Step 2: be a moron
A few months ago when I read Barbara Ehrenreich's book "Bait and Switch",
I noticed that something was badly missing. The main thesis of this
book is that since the author, going undercover as a middle-aged
academically educated woman, can't get a well-paid white-collar job in advertising
public relations, this proves that America is bad. I don't remember the
book at any point explaining why the character that the author
pretended to be was entitled to such a job, so that her not getting one
proves that something is wrong. After all, the vast majority of men and
women are not in any way entitled to such dream jobs. Making this step
a bit more explicit would have made the case of the whole book much
stronger.
I also found it hilarious that the book jacket explained that this character "had done everything right" in her life. By implication, I guess those women depicted in "Nickel and Dimed" did not. Whoops! My favourite saying "Chasing the rabbit, the hunter is blind to mountains" once again applies: when a leftist is trying to make some bigger point, she sometimes forgets to follow the official party line in minor issues, accidentally revealing to all what she really thinks of them. In many other occasions, I have noticed leftists cheerfully admitting that they believe in e.g. the validity of IQ and standardized tests.
I remember encountering a similar omission once before. Around the time when complaining that too many students drop out of the high schools in Ontario was in vogue, one article in the Toronto Star introduced a high school dropout teenage boy and complained that he can only get the most menial minimum-wage jobs. I remember wondering that since somebody has to do those jobs, why not him? What precisely makes this guy so special that he deserves better? Because we now know him and his name? Looking at his picture (he looked like pretty much what you would have expected), I couldn't help but think that his white skin might have had something to do with this sympathy.
Steve Dutch put it well in his page "Top Ten No Sympathy Lines (Plus a Few Extra)":
I also found it hilarious that the book jacket explained that this character "had done everything right" in her life. By implication, I guess those women depicted in "Nickel and Dimed" did not. Whoops! My favourite saying "Chasing the rabbit, the hunter is blind to mountains" once again applies: when a leftist is trying to make some bigger point, she sometimes forgets to follow the official party line in minor issues, accidentally revealing to all what she really thinks of them. In many other occasions, I have noticed leftists cheerfully admitting that they believe in e.g. the validity of IQ and standardized tests.
I remember encountering a similar omission once before. Around the time when complaining that too many students drop out of the high schools in Ontario was in vogue, one article in the Toronto Star introduced a high school dropout teenage boy and complained that he can only get the most menial minimum-wage jobs. I remember wondering that since somebody has to do those jobs, why not him? What precisely makes this guy so special that he deserves better? Because we now know him and his name? Looking at his picture (he looked like pretty much what you would have expected), I couldn't help but think that his white skin might have had something to do with this sympathy.
Steve Dutch put it well in his page "Top Ten No Sympathy Lines (Plus a Few Extra)":
The work force is full of people who do the minimum necessary to get by. Give me one reason why I, as a citizen or consumer, should help create more of them.
Call me elitist, but there are a lot more people who want good jobs than there are good jobs to go around. I think society has a perfect right to reserve those positions for people who demonstrate a commitment to excellence.
For people who want to get by on the minimum, there's a reward already established. It's called the minimum wage.
Professor Dutch's another web page "Spectacularly Stupid Commentaries on September 11, 2001" contains a section "Dropouts to the rescue!" that explains that yes, Virginia, the high school dropouts really are stupid.
Barbara Ehrenreich was looking for a job in public relations, not advertising per se. It's an important distinction because success in public relations work depends in part on the number of contacts you've built up over time. In other words, it's a difficult field to break into when you are almost 60 and don't claim to have built up any sort of network, as was the case with Ehrenreich.
Peter
Iron rails and iron weights
Posted by Anonymous | 12:28 PM
Right, I had some little brain glitch there.
I don't think that I have thanked you yet for posting corrections and additional info for my postings, so I might as well thank you here, Peter. My blog has at least one regular reader, it seems.
Posted by Ilkka | 1:08 PM
Hmm, weird, I enjoyed a lot to read your latest writings. More than slight Socratean feeling they have,
Posted by Mikko Moilanen | 2:13 PM