This is G o o g l e's cache of http://sixteenvolts.blogspot.com/2006/09/speaker-podiums-and-tides-of-night.html as retrieved on 16 Sep 2006 23:38:34 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:E_gpHHUYcOoJ:sixteenvolts.blogspot.com/2006/09/speaker-podiums-and-tides-of-night.html+site:sixteenvolts.blogspot.com&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=480


Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

Send As SMS

« Home | A few matters of morals and the social order » | Return to the Planet of the Apes » | Oh boys, if you only knew » | Humppa eller dö » | Esse ad posse » | A hero is an insect in this world » | You wish I wasn't here, you're scared because I think » | The happiest place on Earth » | All the way to Santa Monica » | Lucky Ilkka »

The speaker podiums and the tides of the night

This morning, the breakfast television show on the local TV channel featured a homeopathic "doctor" who was peddling his "scientific" ideas about health, with the host cheering him on. I could only watch it for a few minutes before becoming thoroughly disgusted so that I had to change the channel. Homeopathy and other "alternative" medicines seem to be the same for leftists as creationism is to the right: the more intellectual leaders of the movement silently feel ashamed and disgusted by the sheer stupidity of these ideas, but they know that a large number of people in their team enthusiastically support them, so they pay these ideas lip service and abstain from ever criticizing them, quickly changing the topic whenever it comes up. But I do find it very telling of the leftist moral principles that they have no problem with charismatic quacks selling water as medicine for sick people, as long as it comes with a scientific-sounding story of "molecular water memory".

Ah well, perhaps one day these people will have to get treatment for their serious burn injuries in a burn ward that operates on homeopathic principles. Just like there are no atheists in foxholes, very few homeopaths (or any other ooga-booga faith healers, for that matter) can be found to operate inside burn wards! That would almost be something out of the Hoogerbrugge site (what, is that like Dutch or something?) that I first encountered years ago and that features several little interactive Flash animations of existentialist bent. Now there is a whole new series available, called "Nails". Jump, little man, jump, so that you might one day get some cigarettes that would momentarily make you feel better in this non-caring and completely pointless universe.

The farmer and the cowman should perhaps be friends, but no matter how you slice it, to get more than 50% of population behind your party you necessarily have to reel in under your banner some mutually hostile groups whose interests are fundamentally in conflict with each other. The essay "The Populist Paradox" at the Progress Report indirectly examines what this means for politicians aiming to be populist.

Don't be afraid to ask, comrade, since you also are a worker! The site "Soviet Music" features many songs from the socialist international to inspire us the advance the worldwide socialist revolution. Che Guevara, the handsome and brutal revolutionary who is still the perennial idol of the "progressive" youth everywhere so that they love to display his imagine in their shirts and dorm room walls, alone has inspired several pages of songs by the workers from all around the world.

The whole brouhaha about the demotion of Pluto from the set of planets seems to have died down. The post "Pluto: Stupid planet for dumb jerks" at "Man vs. Clown" sums up the relevant facts.

When I was a kid and saw the movie "Star Wars" for the first time, I thought that the stormtroopers were supposed to be robots. Ah well, clones, robots, same diff, either one having no soul. However, we now learn from the news article "Stormtroopers blast through gender barrier" that Stormtroopers can also multiply their ranks in the traditional manner.

The more "rebellious" somebody is, the more certain you can be that behind that "I'm so edgy, I don't conform to rules" act he knows perfectly where the real limits are and observes them carefully. In the end, nobody is as conformist as a "cool" person. I also find it interesting, whenever some comedian or other entertainer claims that there is "nothing sacred" for them and that they just love to slaughter and skewer sacred cows, to look for an issue, a group or a topic that they carefully avoid offending and that they tread around only from a great distance, their silence about it thus ending up speaking much louder than their words. Usually you can pretty much guess from the context and by looking who raves the loudest about him what the sacred cows of a particular person are, so that you don't even have to actually watch these people perform. As an idle exercise for my readers, consider the deliciously poison-tongued but innocent beauty Sarah Silverman, whose comedy musings you can watch in, for example, YouTube or the post "Sarah Silverman: VMA" at "Milk and Cookies". Off the top of my head, I could list about a dozen groups and issues that she would never dream of mocking. How about you?

Speaking of limits, The Derb examines them in his new essay "Race and Conservatism". I find it amusing that he has made the same observation about pre-numerates as I have (my emphasis):

I use a different thought experiment to illustrate this sad truth. Imagine you are addressing a room full of people. We can let them be quite well-educated people, so long as they are not trained statisticians. A room full of students from some university Humanities department will do nicely. Now say the following thing to the room: “Men are, on average, taller than women.” I can almost guarantee—it is nearly a dead certainty—that someone in the room will stand up and say something like: “What about Sally? She’s taller than any of us. Taller than you, for sure—Ha ha ha ha!” The room will then consider your thesis to have been decisively exploded. Men taller than women? Nonsense! Look at Sally!

Easy come, easy go, say the English speakers, whereas idiomatic Finns say that what comes in singing will go out whistling. These principles are vividly illustrated in the article "8 lottery winners who lost their millions".

But we can take confort of the fact that it was all fatalistic anyway: "Living Without Ultimate Moral Responsibility". Even so, it is not smart to post the details of your life online, as explained in the post "Death by Google Calendar: How I Identified you to rob you".

10 comments

yeah, those chyck stormtroopers look pretty cool.

But do those plastic panties retain the fishy smell three weeks later?

Sarah Silverman did get in trouble once for using the word "Chink" on the Conan O'Brien Show (or maybe it was Politically Incorrect, back when that was on the air), so there is at least once case of her violating a modern-day taboo (as opposed to the old taboos about sexuality).

J. Randi - Homeoptahy Explained

Concise, sweet, and funny. :)

She does make fun of MLK here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jN9tyw4OHY

Or check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C61rnL8RNAQ

Off the top of my head, I could list about a dozen groups and issues that she would never dream of mocking.

Could you list at least a few of them? I guess it's easier not to, because if you did someone could actually prove you wrong. I'm sure she has some issues she wouldn't touch, but I really cannot say with any certainty what they are.

Kalle, I would be surprised if Sarah ever seriously mocked morbidly obese women, rape victims, molested children, Africans (even in the style of late Sam Kinison and his famous desert skit), cancer victims, gay men who have AIDS or the homeless.

By the way, the same list applies to every other "nothing sacred" comedian approved by the progressive crowd.

Ilkka: "Kalle, I would be surprised if Sarah ever seriously mocked......molested children..."

But mocking molested children would not be good thing either, would it.

You are right tough, Even if these "nothing sacred" comedians don´t respect the old taboos, they do love the new ones.

Well, it seems that the poor, pissed upon, AIDS victims have been pissed upon again.

TB is getting lots of them, and a new, resistant strain at that.

Kalle, I would be surprised if Sarah ever seriously mocked morbidly obese women, rape victims, molested children, Africans (even in the style of late Sam Kinison and his famous desert skit), cancer victims, gay men who have AIDS or the homeless.

I don't know what would be seriously mocking, but you should probably watch Jesus Is Magic where Sarah talks about some of those issues.("I was raped by a doctor, which is so bittersweet for a Jewish girl", "When God gives you AIDS, make lemonaids", and de-boning Ethiopian babies for jewelry etc.)

And I'm not sure why obese women and homeless people are on your list, since almost all the comedians I like have some material on obese people (men and women) and the homeless (probably because they are annoying as hell). Many of them have something on cancer victims too, though mostly lung cancer. But they probably aren't approved by the progressive crowd.

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link

Contact

ilkka.kokkarinen@gmail.com

Buttons

Site Meter
Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]