This is G o o g l e's cache of http://sixteenvolts.blogspot.com/2006/09/justice-schmustice.html as retrieved on 14 Sep 2006 14:29:50 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:j691vBJjT90J:sixteenvolts.blogspot.com/2006/09/justice-schmustice.html+site:sixteenvolts.blogspot.com&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=89


Google is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

Send As SMS

« Home | You're killing my buzz, man » | Who can solve this problem? The candyman can! » | Soap and water » | Release the kodiak with fetal alcohol syndrome » | Hit and sunk » | The slides into the past » | They shoot horses, don't they? » | Everyone has the blues » | You wouldn't blog on the computer that you browse porn with, right? » | Real cool traders »

Justice schmustice

Seeing that what I teach is essentially logic and discrete mathematics, I can't help but be curious about the site "Radical Math" and its new approach to teaching mathematics in a way that "integrates social justice" into the math class. Oh, I don't know, something tells me that this site will soon be receiving blogospheric attention similar to what the Seattle School system received for their little policy page that, among other things, declared that "future time orientation" is a form of cultural racism. This excellent link that I am sure will keep entertaining me for a long time was provided by Old Nick himself, The Derb, who in is his another post "Safety First" raises the issue of road safety:

Does the driver of a suicide car-bomb buckle up before setting out on his holy mission, I wonder?

Just like a mobster never pays for a drink, neither do I would ever pay money for a book. Of course, I hope that other people keep buying my books. However, just like a lawyer who presents himself has a fool for a client, a writer who self-publishes using a vanity press is a dweeb. Or is he? The more I think about it, the more appealing the basic idea of Lulu.com seems to me. This is like really "long tail" and all that other crap. I promise that if I ever happen to write a novel or a cookbook (since it is clear that the world doesn't have enough of those already), I will publish it in Lulu and market it here in my blog for all my numerous readers. Imagine that, a whole novel that was written in the style and spirit of Sixteen Volts. I must have written enough words here already to fill a normal-sized paperback.

I wouldn't really know what the kids are listening to these days and talking about on their hippity hop blackberries and MySpace pages, but I have understood that at some point Britney Spears was the idol of all little girls everywhere and that she was on the top of the pop music scene. I do have to wonder if anyone can remain on the top if she essentially takes off three years from all that singing and performing business to have babies, though. Hey, maybe Linda Hirshman would have something to say about that. But what I sure didn't know (but should have guessed) that even though this is Britney's second kid, it is already the fourth for her hubby K-Fed, as reported in "Britney Spears Is a Mom Again" by "What Would Tyler Durden Do?" Of course, for all his supposed stupidity, a man simply has to have more that just a little something going for him to be able to monopolize the affections of the current top female artist in the music business. This therefore makes me wonder whether the whole K-Fed thing is mostly an act, the same way that I suspect Paris Hilton's public persona to be mostly an act, while privately both Paris and Kevin laugh all the way to the bank. And what truly beautiful acts they are: everybody throughout the ideological spectrum so badly wants it to be the truth that they can't even for a moment think about the possibility that it might be only an act. As the journalistic expression puts it, it is "too good to check".

And if it is not an act, perhaps in fifteen years we will see a reality show "Growing up Federline", with the rowdy boys trying to be like their father. Speaking of reality shows, the post "Narcissism" by Kevin Drum (how the heck does that guy get to use the domain name of a magazine as the address of his blog?) links to the news article "Celebrities Are Their Own Biggest Fans" that tells us that celebrities are more narcissistic as average people. Big surprise there, but like Kevin points out, scoring only two points more on a scale that goes up to 40 is not really that big a difference, once we remember that you necessarily need to have some narcissistic traits to even try to become a celebrity by climbing over millions of others who desire the same.

The study reveals that the female reality show contestants are the most narcissistic of the bunch, which is not really that surprising. On the very top where people such as Brad Pitt, Bono or Bill Gates reside, I have to wonder if we can even talk about "narcissism" in any meaningful way, since as they say, it is not bragging if you can back it up. If somebody really were more talented and successful than other people, would it be psychologically wrong for him to also think that he is? If such a person does not suffer fools lightly in his busy life, but surrounds himself only with the very best, and he expects to be pampered and treated like royalty instead of buying his own groceries, is there anything fundamentally wrong with this behaviour?

Comments

Links to this post

Create a Link

Contact

ilkka.kokkarinen@gmail.com

Buttons

Site Meter
Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]